Reading Inquiry - Strip it back

 

10 years plus into the online world of sharing our student and teacher learning online.  Where are we now?  Time for a stocktake I say!

Sitting with my mentor I had the opportunity to look through my teaching team and our provisions on line from planning through to the learner and whanau.   It became very clear that the baseline of these provisions were somewhat murky...hard to see.    An example: WALTS were stated, it took travelling to slides 3-4 before arriving at a task that focused on WALT.   

While likely the students knew where to find the basics of:

1. WALT: what we are learning today

2. TEXT SET: what we are reading/watching/listening to this week

3. FEEDBACK & FEED FORWARD: for/from student, teacher and whanau

It was not clear enough with my lense of 'Team Leader', 'Mum' hat on.   Time to reset.

At a recent PD for PES staff and also a cluster PD with Rebecca this was a list that my team came up as definite work-ons, must haves for our weekly delivery in reading.  We decided to make a real effort of providing for the following in a limited number of slides.  Explicit teaching also about why we are having more than one text - explaining T shaped literacy.  Trying for 5-6 slides at the most with the following:

*1. Summary (story web, back plan - give a word count)

2. Word work (focus on vocabulary)

3. Comprehension (literal/inferential)

*4. WALT - the problem area (reorganisation/evaluation type questions)

5. Create - mindful of gear and length of time to complete 

6. Showing of additional texts found by reader 

As a team we are sharing fortnightly on a single WALT, text set and follow up activities.  This has been really helpful for the team. Not only are we sharing but picking up ideas from one another that are successful so far this term.  We are trying the same with our maths.   Goal: to get back to a baseline that covers the basics of good quality learning and teaching for our students, teachers and whanau.

Data analysis in action - data to empower learners!

We've completed another round of IKAN's and here are our results for our target group.   I have moved one in and another out of this target group.    My target group are made up of students sitting a level below the national standard in maths.

Process:
We carried out the process as explained in previous posts.   Sitting test by going through IKAN twice, on own chromebook and earphones and then our discussion around our new set of results.

Points of difference:
1. Entering data together: 
This time I had the data on the big screen with the group.   I added this months results next to data collected earlier in year in front of the whole group.   Each student shared which stage they were at for the various categories:
a. Number sequence and order
b. Fractions
c. Place Value
d. Basic Facts

2. Colour codes: Green - shift made, orange - same stage, red - back a stage, yellow shifted more than one stage.  Student by student they needed to look at previous data and tell me if it was 'Green, orange, red or yellow'.   All this from the big screen as shown in image above. This meant the students looked closely at the data making comparisons for themselves - some looks of happiness and disappointment.  In reflection all students agreed that it was good useful information to help them.
The adding of colour helped students see more clearly how to track our data as learners and the teacher.

3. Setting the next steps for self: 
From this data analysis students posted on a doc - as shown below of what their problem areas were and how they planned to tackle the learning needed.  You can see some understand the purpose of this workbook others - well I'll need to coach them.   They were directed to say 'How' they were going specifically  try to improve  OR whether they needed help from me.  They attempted this exercise with the answer sheet in hand to see if they could comprehend further their path of error.

We plan to share our own reflective posts soon.  Watch this space!